Sun, surf, and segregation
Mar. 31st, 2003 12:46 pmI’m back from a week of pure escapist lounging in Key West. I managed to get plenty of sun without collecting a sunburn, plenty of water while only getting slightly queasy once or twice, several slices of excellent Key Lime pie, the opportunity to commune with both stray cats and chickens and captive butterflies, and my recommended weekly allowance of drag shows. The week’s soundtrack was overall excellent, though
lediva did lament the lack of Beach Boys. Most importantly, I got a well-needed big ol’ chunk of high-quality time with
lediva, who is just an amazingly wonderful person to be around.
We stayed at Pearl’s Rainbow, a women-only resort in the old part of Key West, and a perfect home base for wandering around. It was quirky and comfortable and populated by older-than-Spring-Breakers lesbian couples, who lounged around a pool surrounded by tropical plants, sunning themselves. It was cozy and safe feeling and just right. I’m not sure why part of me feels, on a gut level, that these people are more like me than the perfect-in-a-bikini 22 year-old Spring Breakers on the boats, without talking to either of them. It’s all physical stereotyping, and it makes me feel vaguely ashamed when I catch myself at it. Sometimes I feel like a real fake in lesbian spaces, me with the wedding ring and the phallic talisman tucked into my clothing and the sort of straightish look and the determinedly ambisexual spirit.
In general, I’m kind of conflicted about the fact that I really enjoy women’s spaces, gay or straight. I know so many gender-variant people who’d love to be welcomed into that kind of community, and just can’t for physical reasons manage it. I know people in male bodies who are much more safe/caring/loving/add-your-own-stereotype-here than some women that I know. I’ve been in women’s groups where people are gossipy, catty, and just not very nice, and ones where the main topic of conversation is male-bashing. And I can’t really put my finger firmly on what the difference in womanspace is, something that feels energetically different, something about the gender sameness that matters, even though by all reasonable rights it shouldn’t. Nevertheless I really crave it, especially in a spiritual/religious context.
Now I’m back in the office, with a lab bay filled with about seventeen quadrillion boxes that got sent to me during the week, a dusting of snow on the grass outside, and no increase in desire to hang out with my coworkers, whom I’m not sure noticed that I was gone. Life goes on.
We stayed at Pearl’s Rainbow, a women-only resort in the old part of Key West, and a perfect home base for wandering around. It was quirky and comfortable and populated by older-than-Spring-Breakers lesbian couples, who lounged around a pool surrounded by tropical plants, sunning themselves. It was cozy and safe feeling and just right. I’m not sure why part of me feels, on a gut level, that these people are more like me than the perfect-in-a-bikini 22 year-old Spring Breakers on the boats, without talking to either of them. It’s all physical stereotyping, and it makes me feel vaguely ashamed when I catch myself at it. Sometimes I feel like a real fake in lesbian spaces, me with the wedding ring and the phallic talisman tucked into my clothing and the sort of straightish look and the determinedly ambisexual spirit.
In general, I’m kind of conflicted about the fact that I really enjoy women’s spaces, gay or straight. I know so many gender-variant people who’d love to be welcomed into that kind of community, and just can’t for physical reasons manage it. I know people in male bodies who are much more safe/caring/loving/add-your-own-stereotype-here than some women that I know. I’ve been in women’s groups where people are gossipy, catty, and just not very nice, and ones where the main topic of conversation is male-bashing. And I can’t really put my finger firmly on what the difference in womanspace is, something that feels energetically different, something about the gender sameness that matters, even though by all reasonable rights it shouldn’t. Nevertheless I really crave it, especially in a spiritual/religious context.
Now I’m back in the office, with a lab bay filled with about seventeen quadrillion boxes that got sent to me during the week, a dusting of snow on the grass outside, and no increase in desire to hang out with my coworkers, whom I’m not sure noticed that I was gone. Life goes on.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-31 09:56 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-31 10:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-31 11:25 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-31 11:37 am (UTC)At least your Bisexual Card is up-to-date. The last large stamp on mine is from 1996.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-31 11:54 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2003-03-31 12:03 pm (UTC)no subject
o/~ We're stabbing our brothers and sisters in the back I'm gonna say
Na, na na na na na, I ain't gonna play Sun City... o/~
I really wish I'd saved a copy of that challenge to single-gender spaces I sent off to
Lediva did lament the lack of Beach Boys
*punctuated, smirking silence*
*beat*
"Maybe Brian could've snuck in with a set of falsies."
no subject
Date: 2003-03-31 12:29 pm (UTC)I'd be curious to see it, if you find it or can reconstruct it. I'm sure you've got more to say than "it's discrimatory and I want in!", which is the usual argument. I think we've only discussed the topic briefly once before, and I was hard to understand at the time because I was wearing my new fangs.
And as I said above, I often feel quite torn that womenspace is so primally emotionally satisfying to me, because on an intellectual level the concept kind of disappoints.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-31 01:09 pm (UTC)I wish I were as sure as you. I can't help but feel they misidentify the thing they're trying to sort for. While that sorting is useful even if flawed, it does a hell of a lot of harm to people like me -- not just in terms of missed opportunities, but of the false distinctions it perpetuates. There's still ample room for compromise, but short of things like TransBound, the feminist community doesn't seem to waste any time worrying about whether their postgendered allies are getting the door slammed in their faces. As I pointed out to Sev (Aynjel's friend), I am not a mere auxiliary to feminism, nor a camp follower. Feminism is the intellectual root of all gender criticism in modern society (AFAIK?). There is no masculine alternative except for queer theory, which a) is an academic offshoot of feminism anyhow and b) doesn't really represent my own goals or identity in most forms. Women's spaces are the only spaces where some of these issues are being robustly discussed. If I must start a group of my own out in the parking lot... so be it, but the feminist movement will lose itself a potential supporter and I'll lose even more power.
I don't see why it's all right to filter out the entirety of the male sex regardless of behavior, because a few feel threatened by our presence as a whole, due of the actions or attitudes of a subset of people -- people who I, need it be pointed out, am not. It feels, in a very literal way, like visiting the sins of the father upon the child. Though it's the utter right of any citizen to operate or patronize any private group any way they like -- I even support the right of the Scouts to exclude homosexuals -- I think such exclusions on broad biological bases are socially counterproductive. Due to negative reinforcement and happenstance, I was wary around African-Americans for years. I was bullied and beaten regularly by a small group of them. The sociological forces that produced their behavior are real, widespread, and persistent. But how would you feel if I attended a whites-only vacation resort, or attended whites-only discussions about violence, to make sure that I would never repeat the experience?
If you can't make the distinction on the basis of real, consequential traits -- don't make them. Sev compares her desire to be in the company of women, for instance, to her desire to be in the company of her "favorite freaks." But these favored individuals have presumably been individually selected on the basis of their individual personalities, wits, and interests, correct? I do feel that, inevitable though it may be, to make the decision to exclude on the basis of such a broad, malleable trait as gender is "prejudice" by dictionary definition. It is a form of sexism that reinforces gender stereotypes and treats people as nothing more than their participation in a gender -- or their presumed participation. The women's movement presumes that feminine experience is unavailable to males, and I hold myself and my online experiences as evidence, however provisional and limited, that this is simply not the case. Though I retain a great many archetypally masculine traits -- some of which I'm sure would justly be unwelcomed in a feminist "safe space" -- how much lessened would those traits be, were I granted more opportunities to replace them with feminine ones? Once again... give us an "honorary womyn test" -- via ScanTron, if you must -- at the very least. Expand the definitions or collapse them, just don't presume that they are the things the women's movement asserts they are unless you are quite ready to defend the point to me at length. (Er, not directed at you, Bee, or at anyone in particular -- just possessed by the spirit of Emma Goldman again. ;) ) Otherwise, I'll continue believing that the feminist movement is, indeed, one of the very things that perpetuates and preserves the masculine traits to which it objects.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-31 01:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-31 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-31 02:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-31 04:05 pm (UTC)That said, I think you're right about there being a difference. As an almost 50, bi, involved with another female person...well, I feel vastly uncomfortable *showing* that affection in 'public'. My love is even more inhibited about it. When I read the description, my first thought was "Oh, that would be wonderful!". I'd like to feel comfortable enough to 'spoon' with my love...but unless it is someplace specifically designated as such and that I KNOW is safe, I can't do it.
Yes, organizations are one thing...but a private vacation is something else. And I think I should have the option of going somewhere I'm comfortable enjoying myself. If no one provides that...well, hiding in hotels rooms to cuddle instead of holding hands down by the pool is a lot less fun.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Re:
From:(no subject)
From:Re:
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Re:
From:Safety and Comfort
From:Re: Safety and Comfort
From:I sold out my gender and all I got was this lousy T-shirt.
From:Re: I sold out my gender and all I got was this lousy T-shirt.
From:Re: I sold out my gender and all I got was this lousy T-shirt.
From:Re: I sold out my gender and all I got was this lousy T-shirt.
From:Re: I sold out my gender and all I got was this lousy T-shirt.
From:Re: I sold out my gender and all I got was this lousy T-shirt.
From:Re: I sold out my gender and all I got was this lousy T-shirt.
From:no subject
Date: 2003-04-01 02:07 pm (UTC)In either case, I have a fairly (and uncharacteristically ;> ) libertarian attitude towards the solution. I don't mind the existence of such spaces as long as viable alternatives exist -- and as long as no force, intentional or otherwise, inhibits the creation of such spaces.
I think people should manage their "spaces" in a certain way because it's good for society, not because anyone else has the right to make them change against their will (unless it's a public institution or a monopoly). And the only weapon I can rightfully wield to make somebody open up their private spaces to me is my own reason and powers of persuasion.
In the case of social spaces, off the top of my head... For one thing, I do have a problem with the seeming double-standard that the feminist movement applies. I've never seen a good rationale (and I invite such -- I haven't done all that much research into this and I'm sure they exist) for why male-only places like the Scouts and the Augusta tournaments are to be lobbied against, but female-only places like Pearl's Rainbow are to be welcomed. I don't accept the argument that the power differential alone excuses it. Though real, I believe the power differential between men and women is also very fluid; it is entirely conceivable to me that there have developed cases in which women do oppress men, and in such cases that disparity too should be corrected.
Furthermore, once again, it raises the question of what, precisely, is being selected for. Is it something biological or psychological? If you'll forgive me being a bit wry again... if the purpose of Pearl's Rainbow were synchronized menstruation, I'd be all for it. :p But it's presumably the creation of a certain environment, where certain forms of human relation can thrive and others will be excluded. How predictably can those be associated with biological sex -- and to what extent can this separation be blamed for perpetuating this predictability?
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Re:
From:(no subject)
From:Re:
From:no subject
Date: 2003-03-31 12:07 pm (UTC)Also, I like womens groups too, but I don't get into typical "girly" things. You give me a room full of women who like to read, or like anthropology, or learning about world religons and oh my GOD I'd be in heaven!!! I like brainy girls. Oh that reminds me, Beetiger...will you sleep with me?
*giggles*
no subject
Date: 2003-03-31 12:25 pm (UTC)And play Scrabble. Anybody who wants to get anywhere with me has to be willing to play Scrabble. :)
Re:
Date: 2003-03-31 01:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-03-31 02:59 pm (UTC)I may swoon.
no subject
Date: 2003-03-31 08:40 pm (UTC)no subject
You'll have to allow me to bring Encore (The Song-Filled Sing-Off Game!), because the longest word I put down in Scrabble is usually "cat". But sometimes I can put down "cats"
(no subject)
From:Re:
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:Re:
From:did you say scrabble?
Date: 2003-03-31 09:10 pm (UTC)(and please consider this a much-belated "it was nice to meet you", because, well, it was nice to meet you, and I've been a bad Lapis and haven't written...)
Re: did you say scrabble?
Date: 2003-04-01 03:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-04-02 10:31 am (UTC)Scrabble
Date: 2003-04-01 06:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-04-02 10:22 am (UTC)"... The whole KW experience is kind of surreal - Like a theme park for Jimmy Buffet fans, crossed with a tag-team pick-up scooter race."
:)