Food for thought
Said by
chipuni, on a friend's (locked) post, but I think the importance of this statement transcends the context:
The difference between "I don't understand X" and "I should attack X" is gigantic. People aren't taught that "I don't understand X" is an opportunity, not a threat.
The difference between "I don't understand X" and "I should attack X" is gigantic. People aren't taught that "I don't understand X" is an opportunity, not a threat.
no subject
The automatic assumption that life is a zero-sum game (Everything you share with someone else is automatically a lessening of yourself, including thoughts/ideas) is burned so deeply in the human psyche that I don't expect it to go away anytime soon. (On this track, Bucky Fuller's Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth might interest you.)
Comparisons between human and ape behavior have been made at length WRT this, IIRC, and suggest that it might possibly be something hardwired.
Re:
no subject
no subject
Thanks for the pithy statement: it is nearly universally applicable. "I don't understand" and "I'm wrong" are seen (in our mainstream culture) as confessions of weakness or submission. How incredibly dangerous!
Re:
no subject
Thank you for the support!
no subject
Amazing how clearly that's articulated.
Oh. ran across you thanks to Janezero's journal (and some stolen time at the office ...heh)
Where I'm from originally, people will tend to say "that's different" about anything new encountered, and some of them say it with a frown, some with a smile. It's the smilers that I try to find.